Newsroom2020-11-01T18:19:26+00:00

THE NEWSROOM

Media Training Diary – 13th March

On the face of it Gary Lineker’s initial approach to being doorstepped as the furore gathered pace last week was a case study in how not to react…
(1) The “yes I would like to say something…a very good morning to you all” comes across as smug.

(2) The problem of giving an answer to a simple question (“(have) you spoken to the Director General?”) is that it opens the door to the harder question (“What did he say?”) which Lineker then refuses to answer.

(3) As he gets into the car journalists switch to quick yes or no questions, (“Do you regret sending the tweet?” “Do you stand by what you said?”). He may be happy with his responses but this is the worst time to make knee-jerk public statements fundamental to your future job prospects and reputation.

You may disagree. And Lineker has received praise for not allowing himself to be bullied by a press pack.

But bring doorstepped is a very difficult media encounter – impossible to know how stressful it is until you’ve felt what it’s like to be in the middle of one.

Be polite. Stay calm. Avoid “no comment” but don’t be bullied into answering questions. Which is exactly the tactic Lineker opted for 24 hours later. A smart suit and a courteous smile guaranteed a photo on every front page.

By |19 March 2023|

Media Training Diary – 6th March

“There are two things in the world you never want to let people see how you make – laws and sausages.”

Leo McGarry, The West Wing

A couple of big stories last week made me think we should add ‘news’ to that list. First up from Isabel Oakeshott’s leak of the Matt Hancock WhatsApp messages, an exchange between the former Health Secretary and George Osborne, then editor of the Standard:

Secondly, Rupert Murdoch’s jaw-dropping deposition to a voting systems lawsuit. Firstly he admitted knowing Fox News hosts spread lies about the 2020 presidential election being stolen from Donald Trump. He then confessed he allowed them to keep on doing so on air to millions of viewers. (Detail here)

As the Lincoln Project’s Rick Wilson puts it, “They admittedly engaged in fraud and lied to their audience.”

Perhaps neither of these two stories surprise you in the least. Maybe you’re reading this and thinking, “And?…”

Fair enough. But while I’m happy to live in ignorance about sausages, when it comes to laws and the news, it doesn’t hurt to peel the lid off occasionally.

By |8 March 2023|

Media Training Diary – 27th February

Margaret Thatcher’s legendary former press secretary Bernard Ingham has died at the age of 90. Whatever your views on his politics (or the politics of his boss), he was a formidable operator. I love this quote attributed to him:

“Always feed the dogs at the front gate or they’ll scavenge from the bins at the back.”

Keep that quote in your mind as you prepare for media engagement. Journalists will generally want to seek out a news line and if you don’t feed them one they’re more likely to pursue paths you might not want them to head down.

Good content leads to control and direction. A lack of content means you will always be on the back foot in interviews.

Incidentally Ingham was very generous with his time. At university I (smugly) wrote my dissertation on whether his power and influence undermined our democracy. Despite this premise he agreed to meet and we ended up talking for over three hours. I was determined to get a decent news line out of him…and failed to get even remotely close.

By |8 March 2023|

Media Training Diary – 13th February

Respected science journalist Jonathan O’Callaghan tweeted the following last week:

“Someone declined an interview with me because they said their discovery was “too small and not worth reporting.”

He went on to insist, “I told them it was cool!”

Where do your sympathies lie? You might applaud the honesty of the academic, heroically turning down the chance of headlines and column inches.

It just leaves me frustrated. Journalists don’t chase stories “too small and not worth reporting”. Often researchers absorbed in the detail and the process can’t see the bigger picture and the impact their work has (or might have) on the audience.

To be fair there’s a chance something else is going on here. O’Callaghan may be pursuing an unspoken angle that might portray the science in a negative light, but I very much doubt that’s the case.

If a journalist you respect (and that word is crucial) thinks what you are doing is newsworthy then go with them. They know how to do their job. Don’t sensationalise, don’t distort, and root what you’re doing in the audience’s world.

 

By |8 March 2023|

GET IN TOUCH

LET’S DISCUSS YOUR REQUIREMENTS

    Name

    Organisation

    Your Email

    Your Message

    Go to Top